I would boil submitted comment down to this: 18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact
"Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years."
The specified processes employed by the FDA and their pharma/ghoul conglomerates since 2020 are criminal acts, period. All principal parties need to hang from a gallows until dead.
I just watched a WCH - Tess Lawrie video with a doctor who exposed that VETERINARIANS are now giving modRNA rabies shots, which are self-spreading tech. Maybe you can reach the cat ladies at the FDA with the news that their "fur babies" are being poisoned.
Rabies shot killed 2 of my sister cats. One within 3 days post shot and the other got symptoms of heart failure within 24 hours post shot and she was deemed healthy by the vet before the shots. That poor girl lasted 9 months (because I couldn’t bare to put her down). I have 3 rescues, only 1 has shots from SF spca, so not sure how many) the other 2 are ferals directly from the streets. They’re strictly indoors with a catio and they eat primarily raw. They’re doing great!
Oh, that makes me seethe. :( Glad to hear you’re doing raw and jab-free for the feral ones!!!!! I do raw chicken & pureed veggies when I have the time and funds. :)
It makes me seethe, too. My beloved Lucy died in 2018, I wasn’t aware of the dangers of haxxines until 2021. Despite beginning my awakening in August 2021 I wasn’t fully aware of the mega deception, yet. Even though I had a violent reaction to my 2nd c19 death shot January 2021, I went ahead and got my sweet Sparkle Barbie her last rabies shot. She would die a violent death, screaming and projectile vomiting the whole way to the vet ER. Where you had to wait in your car to be triaged! Needless to say this was my epiphany that all drugs (especially the forced ones) are bioweapons! It hurts my heart that I trusted vets, doctors and looked up to the “professionals”. No more!!
I know I repeat my stories on Substack but I figure it might save heartbreak if they’ve never heard it before.
The owner of my vet practice won't see my dogs. (Meaning, he won't see me;) Fortunately, his associate is very supportive. We got a titer for my Grif, and 3 years out from her last shot she's fine. (We live in a rural area with occasional rabid raccoon sightings.) I'm so sorry about your sister's cats.
Are they “rabid” from the vaccine rabies packets that are dropped out of helicopters? I’m going to make the suggestion that wildlife and animals are poisoned, they don’t actually have rabies. I believe that They are expressing symptoms of being poisoned.
Not inconceivable. But I question it because here, most dogs (and many cats) spend a lot of time outside in the woods and fields, and they're not getting rabies. It would seem logical to me that they'd at least occasionally pick up one of those packets. Either way, it's worth exploring. Let's find out!
Wild animals are being poisoned just as bad, if not worse, they are relying on fresh water and food but have none. They’re the canaries in the coal mine and victims of countless bioweapons and toxic frequencies, too.
Since we know that polio "vaccines" cause polio, and MMR shots can cause nasty mutations of measles, and covid jabs caused escape mutants to evolve, (which is the least of their horrible effects,) it's possible that these rabies vax pouches cause rabies. Or, more terrifyingly, encourage mutations that are more virulent. All of my deeper-dive bandwidth right now is going toward covid shots and infertility. It's exhausting, isn't it? We have no shortage of mad scientists, ignorant doctors, and gullible citizens. Thanks for your research!!
All vaccines are bioweapons. All of them. Keeps the medical cartel in business.
The Amish don't allow their children to be vaccinated, and they have no autism or deaths, convulsions, blood clots and sudden collapses in drug stores.
Kat wrote a book in 8 words. "This is not science this is vaccine religion". Kat's mention of "impact investment opportunities" reminds of what Alison McDowell researched about that issue 5 years ago. Frank Bergman wrote a Slay News article May 1 about Aerovax. The Gates Foundation seems to be involved with the Aerovax and HEK-293. They generated HEK-293 in 1973 the same year they ramped up Roe V. Wade. They have been working on this stuff for decades.
Wow I just read some of the comments many left in favor of implementing vaccines. Who are these people? Boy do I know how you feel, I spent much time writing things to local officials and agencies during the lockdown only to get " thanks for your letter." answers. Handled kooks.
Most of those comments are left by shills feeding on the pharmaceutical teats. I found the same thing to be true when I wrote to the California Department of pesticide regulation and opposition of their proposed release of genetically modified mosquitoes.
The only letters in favor of this release were the mosquito vector control district managers. :-) and a couple of compromised politicians.
I have written the FDA, CDC and even the SEC about stock buybacks being illegal stock price manipulation by their own definition. As you have found, to no avail. That leaves few options other than a potentially disastrous 1789 thrashing. How can the FDA and CDC recommend supremely high risk and dangerous mRNA jabs for the infinitely low risk of Covid death to children? Wait a tic. Since these are "smart" but way evil people, there must be a motive. Hmmmm.
When the covid vaccines were first given Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA, the understanding was that there would be rigorous post-market safety monitoring of these products. One of the conditions was that the CDC would perform proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis to compare the rate of adverse events with prior vaccines. Yet the CDC failed to do so, and offered conflicting information about its responsibilty to perform the analysis that would have given early warnings about adverse events of special interest. (See Senator Ron Johnson's press release about his letter to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky concerning this matter. https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/9/sen-johnson-to-cdc-director-walensky-you-have-failed-to-provide-data-on-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-events)
These early warnings could have and should have halted the rollout of all three products available in the United States in early 2021 because the odds of serious injury and death following these vaccines were astronomically higher than the risk following any other vaccine given in the prior three decades since the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System was put in place. Here is one example of this failure on the part of government agencies, as evidenced by the work of independent researchers who took it upon themselves to perform the type of safety surveillance that the government should have done.
COVID-19 Vaccines: A Risk Factor for Cerebral Thrombotic Syndromes
"CTE (cerebral thromboembolism) AEs (adverse events) after COVID-19 vaccines were compared to those after influenza vaccines and after all other vaccines using proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis by time. Results: There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months)."
Despite the CDC's continued claim that "COVID-19 vaccines used in the response to the pandemic underwent the most intensive safety monitoring in U.S. history," (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety-systems/monitoring/covid-19.html), the public still has not seen evidence of this, and the FDA has not required the CDC to produce this evidence.
Therefore, the FDA should not approve any new, updated covid vaccines because the responsible parties have not performed proper safety surveillance on any of the prior ones.
When the covid injections were going to be recommended for children, I wrote a well-reasoned comment on the government website as well, and also emailed every single person on the committee individually. Unless the whole FDA and all the subcommittees responsible for vaccine approval have been replaced, I like your distinct and to the point comment. 🖕🏽
Edit:
I just read commented on the government site, thank you for linking to the other stub stack and making us aware. I just couldn't do the respectful, well reasoned argument thing again. I'm not going to educate them. I basically said they were negligent, fraudulent and criminal by recommending these for infants and children, and wrote a couple reasons why. They have exposed themselves as acting on behalf of pharmaceutical companies rather than protecting the American public when they needed them most. Unless they are all fired, most of the public will continue to ignore any recommendations they make.
I didn't end with the emoji... so that's respectful....
It is imperative when dealing with government organizations to remind the INDIVIDUALS working within it and with whom one is corresponding - whether it be face to face or in writing, that they have a LEGAL DUTY OF CARE. This legal doctrine makes individuals PERSONALLY liable (ie exposing their personal assets in potential lawsuits)
Such duty of care is a legal construct that wields significant legal power. When an individual receives correspondence containing such wording it will often be referred to government lawyers who WILL affirm that it indeed has legal weight. Often government employees, bureaucrats and even those in political office have resigned when receiving such correspondence, especially when they KNOW there has been malfeasance in public office under their watch or in which they have played a role. Having been made aware that they could be sued PERSONALLY makes them see things through a different lens!!!
Thus, when one is writing a letter it is good to remind the recipient of such "legal duty of care"
One could say: "I am tendering this letter in the public interest and as an expression of my deep concern that (such and such activity) may be severely detrimental to human health and that furthermore, it is being conducted in the absence of adequate informed consent. Such actions may undermine public trust and may inevitably lead to increasing scrutiny of your office (or department). Consequently, I would very much appreciate and indeed expect, your response to be reflective of such concerns and your legal duty of care"
Or you can tone it back according to the circumstances and whether it is the first letter you are writing or subsequent ones. If you feel you are being stonewalled you can up the ante!!!
Incorporating such wording will most likely result in it being handballed to their legal department - which is a good thing as the response is likely to be much more carefully drafted rather than being a blanket "palm you off". They will be fully aware that they may be called to account at a later date for the truthfulness and comprehensiveness of their response
It is not easy to be a crusader and call government agencies to account Kat and I admire you very much!!!! ♥
Of the @ 400+ Federal Agencies (going by whatever designation they may), PERHAPS (though this seems GENEROUS) @ 35 - 40 of them MIGHT be deemed "critical" for continued operation (albeit with some significant structural and sphere of operation revisions).
Given that reality, the FDA serves no valuable purpose but in fact acts to create false impressions that something that has its stamp of approval can be trusted to be "safe & effective" when in fact it is entirely financed and overseen by private corporate interests who use it to foist (p)harmaceutical poisons on the masses & excuse the abuses that are repeatedly visited upon a public that has been brainwashed into believing that these "institutions" are there for "our own good," when in fact, this is patently false. Eliminate them all and see what presents itself as essential after we return to the Constitutional minimums of limited Federal Government the founders envisioned and wrote into the document that supposedly all governmental representatives are loyal to and are supposed to uphold. I guarantee the FDA, a creature of a false system of "deathcare" bought & paid for, foisted on us by Rockefeller interests to displace true "Holistic Health Care" practitioners who were systematically disenfranchised and vilified in favor of the administration of surgery, radiation & synthetic rugs to address symptoms but fail to address root causes and therefore restoration of health and robust functioning to humans it "treats" by those in "practice" is an instrument of death, suffering & cover for those with nefarious agendas to use for their own enrichment & advancement. All of this, especially the widespread distribution of synthetic poisons, is part of mystery religions and occult practices masquerading as civilized "science."
Also consider altering genetic makeup ( e.g. Genetically modified organism) makes what ever it is patentable therefore owned. Nature cannot be patented, but genetically modified organisms can be.
“Just like the WEF, we are eager to see our children and grandchildren killed by COVID-19 as soon as possible. We have to let the science and data guide us. The FDA is working around the clock to support the process for making COVID-19 the genocidal method of choice."
The "resistance" at "The People's CDC" is asking for comments in support of access to updated vaccines for all ages two times per year. The post doesn't allow any likes or comments, only sharing, and it had only been shared 11 times before noon today. 😁
Sorry if this was already posted, I haven't read all the comments. Del Bigtree's ICAN recently had a press conference about recordings they have of Peter Marks, mentioned in this article, when he was with the FDA.
I would boil submitted comment down to this: 18 U.S. Code § 3 - Accessory after the fact
"Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years."
Complete text: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3
The specified processes employed by the FDA and their pharma/ghoul conglomerates since 2020 are criminal acts, period. All principal parties need to hang from a gallows until dead.
I just watched a WCH - Tess Lawrie video with a doctor who exposed that VETERINARIANS are now giving modRNA rabies shots, which are self-spreading tech. Maybe you can reach the cat ladies at the FDA with the news that their "fur babies" are being poisoned.
Rabies shot killed 2 of my sister cats. One within 3 days post shot and the other got symptoms of heart failure within 24 hours post shot and she was deemed healthy by the vet before the shots. That poor girl lasted 9 months (because I couldn’t bare to put her down). I have 3 rescues, only 1 has shots from SF spca, so not sure how many) the other 2 are ferals directly from the streets. They’re strictly indoors with a catio and they eat primarily raw. They’re doing great!
Oh, that makes me seethe. :( Glad to hear you’re doing raw and jab-free for the feral ones!!!!! I do raw chicken & pureed veggies when I have the time and funds. :)
It makes me seethe, too. My beloved Lucy died in 2018, I wasn’t aware of the dangers of haxxines until 2021. Despite beginning my awakening in August 2021 I wasn’t fully aware of the mega deception, yet. Even though I had a violent reaction to my 2nd c19 death shot January 2021, I went ahead and got my sweet Sparkle Barbie her last rabies shot. She would die a violent death, screaming and projectile vomiting the whole way to the vet ER. Where you had to wait in your car to be triaged! Needless to say this was my epiphany that all drugs (especially the forced ones) are bioweapons! It hurts my heart that I trusted vets, doctors and looked up to the “professionals”. No more!!
I know I repeat my stories on Substack but I figure it might save heartbreak if they’ve never heard it before.
The owner of my vet practice won't see my dogs. (Meaning, he won't see me;) Fortunately, his associate is very supportive. We got a titer for my Grif, and 3 years out from her last shot she's fine. (We live in a rural area with occasional rabid raccoon sightings.) I'm so sorry about your sister's cats.
Are they “rabid” from the vaccine rabies packets that are dropped out of helicopters? I’m going to make the suggestion that wildlife and animals are poisoned, they don’t actually have rabies. I believe that They are expressing symptoms of being poisoned.
Not inconceivable. But I question it because here, most dogs (and many cats) spend a lot of time outside in the woods and fields, and they're not getting rabies. It would seem logical to me that they'd at least occasionally pick up one of those packets. Either way, it's worth exploring. Let's find out!
Wild animals are being poisoned just as bad, if not worse, they are relying on fresh water and food but have none. They’re the canaries in the coal mine and victims of countless bioweapons and toxic frequencies, too.
https://open.substack.com/pub/mellowkat/p/usda-and-the-rabies-oral-vaccine?r=gecv9&utm_medium=ios
Since we know that polio "vaccines" cause polio, and MMR shots can cause nasty mutations of measles, and covid jabs caused escape mutants to evolve, (which is the least of their horrible effects,) it's possible that these rabies vax pouches cause rabies. Or, more terrifyingly, encourage mutations that are more virulent. All of my deeper-dive bandwidth right now is going toward covid shots and infertility. It's exhausting, isn't it? We have no shortage of mad scientists, ignorant doctors, and gullible citizens. Thanks for your research!!
All vaccines are bioweapons. All of them. Keeps the medical cartel in business.
The Amish don't allow their children to be vaccinated, and they have no autism or deaths, convulsions, blood clots and sudden collapses in drug stores.
Bingo!
Oh my gosh, I didn't know we had a Food and Drug Agency. Actually, all this time I thought it was the Fraudulent Drug Advocate?
Fear and Death Administration
Kat wrote a book in 8 words. "This is not science this is vaccine religion". Kat's mention of "impact investment opportunities" reminds of what Alison McDowell researched about that issue 5 years ago. Frank Bergman wrote a Slay News article May 1 about Aerovax. The Gates Foundation seems to be involved with the Aerovax and HEK-293. They generated HEK-293 in 1973 the same year they ramped up Roe V. Wade. They have been working on this stuff for decades.
I did comment on the Federal Register.
Wow I just read some of the comments many left in favor of implementing vaccines. Who are these people? Boy do I know how you feel, I spent much time writing things to local officials and agencies during the lockdown only to get " thanks for your letter." answers. Handled kooks.
Most of those comments are left by shills feeding on the pharmaceutical teats. I found the same thing to be true when I wrote to the California Department of pesticide regulation and opposition of their proposed release of genetically modified mosquitoes.
The only letters in favor of this release were the mosquito vector control district managers. :-) and a couple of compromised politicians.
It’s a production.
They go through the motions, that’s it.
I have written the FDA, CDC and even the SEC about stock buybacks being illegal stock price manipulation by their own definition. As you have found, to no avail. That leaves few options other than a potentially disastrous 1789 thrashing. How can the FDA and CDC recommend supremely high risk and dangerous mRNA jabs for the infinitely low risk of Covid death to children? Wait a tic. Since these are "smart" but way evil people, there must be a motive. Hmmmm.
https://worldyturnings.com/2023/02/08/why-are-they-killing-us-2/
Here is the comment I left:
When the covid vaccines were first given Emergency Use Authorization by the FDA, the understanding was that there would be rigorous post-market safety monitoring of these products. One of the conditions was that the CDC would perform proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis to compare the rate of adverse events with prior vaccines. Yet the CDC failed to do so, and offered conflicting information about its responsibilty to perform the analysis that would have given early warnings about adverse events of special interest. (See Senator Ron Johnson's press release about his letter to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky concerning this matter. https://www.ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/9/sen-johnson-to-cdc-director-walensky-you-have-failed-to-provide-data-on-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-events)
These early warnings could have and should have halted the rollout of all three products available in the United States in early 2021 because the odds of serious injury and death following these vaccines were astronomically higher than the risk following any other vaccine given in the prior three decades since the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System was put in place. Here is one example of this failure on the part of government agencies, as evidenced by the work of independent researchers who took it upon themselves to perform the type of safety surveillance that the government should have done.
COVID-19 Vaccines: A Risk Factor for Cerebral Thrombotic Syndromes
"CTE (cerebral thromboembolism) AEs (adverse events) after COVID-19 vaccines were compared to those after influenza vaccines and after all other vaccines using proportional reporting ratio (PRR) analysis by time. Results: There are 5137 cerebral thromboembolism AEs reported in the 3 years (36 months) after COVID-19 vaccines compared to 52 AEs for the influenza vaccines over the past 34 years (408 months) and 282 AEs for all other vaccines (excluding COVID-19) over the past 34 years (408 months)."
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/381540040_COVID-19_Vaccines_A_Risk_Factor_for_Cerebral_Thrombotic_Syndromes
Despite the CDC's continued claim that "COVID-19 vaccines used in the response to the pandemic underwent the most intensive safety monitoring in U.S. history," (https://www.cdc.gov/vaccine-safety-systems/monitoring/covid-19.html), the public still has not seen evidence of this, and the FDA has not required the CDC to produce this evidence.
Therefore, the FDA should not approve any new, updated covid vaccines because the responsible parties have not performed proper safety surveillance on any of the prior ones.
Yes!
When the covid injections were going to be recommended for children, I wrote a well-reasoned comment on the government website as well, and also emailed every single person on the committee individually. Unless the whole FDA and all the subcommittees responsible for vaccine approval have been replaced, I like your distinct and to the point comment. 🖕🏽
Edit:
I just read commented on the government site, thank you for linking to the other stub stack and making us aware. I just couldn't do the respectful, well reasoned argument thing again. I'm not going to educate them. I basically said they were negligent, fraudulent and criminal by recommending these for infants and children, and wrote a couple reasons why. They have exposed themselves as acting on behalf of pharmaceutical companies rather than protecting the American public when they needed them most. Unless they are all fired, most of the public will continue to ignore any recommendations they make.
I didn't end with the emoji... so that's respectful....
https://open.substack.com/pub/mellowkat/p/fdas-vaccines-and-related-biological?r=gecv9&utm_medium=ios
Great letter!
I hear your frustration, BUT we must not be silent EVER!
I just wrote the FDA and copy & pasted his exact words .
Agreed. I did say people should leave a comment. I just won’t put my heart and soul into it like I did before.
I’ll just tell them to “eat a bag.”
It is imperative when dealing with government organizations to remind the INDIVIDUALS working within it and with whom one is corresponding - whether it be face to face or in writing, that they have a LEGAL DUTY OF CARE. This legal doctrine makes individuals PERSONALLY liable (ie exposing their personal assets in potential lawsuits)
Such duty of care is a legal construct that wields significant legal power. When an individual receives correspondence containing such wording it will often be referred to government lawyers who WILL affirm that it indeed has legal weight. Often government employees, bureaucrats and even those in political office have resigned when receiving such correspondence, especially when they KNOW there has been malfeasance in public office under their watch or in which they have played a role. Having been made aware that they could be sued PERSONALLY makes them see things through a different lens!!!
Thus, when one is writing a letter it is good to remind the recipient of such "legal duty of care"
One could say: "I am tendering this letter in the public interest and as an expression of my deep concern that (such and such activity) may be severely detrimental to human health and that furthermore, it is being conducted in the absence of adequate informed consent. Such actions may undermine public trust and may inevitably lead to increasing scrutiny of your office (or department). Consequently, I would very much appreciate and indeed expect, your response to be reflective of such concerns and your legal duty of care"
Or you can tone it back according to the circumstances and whether it is the first letter you are writing or subsequent ones. If you feel you are being stonewalled you can up the ante!!!
Incorporating such wording will most likely result in it being handballed to their legal department - which is a good thing as the response is likely to be much more carefully drafted rather than being a blanket "palm you off". They will be fully aware that they may be called to account at a later date for the truthfulness and comprehensiveness of their response
It is not easy to be a crusader and call government agencies to account Kat and I admire you very much!!!! ♥
Of the @ 400+ Federal Agencies (going by whatever designation they may), PERHAPS (though this seems GENEROUS) @ 35 - 40 of them MIGHT be deemed "critical" for continued operation (albeit with some significant structural and sphere of operation revisions).
Given that reality, the FDA serves no valuable purpose but in fact acts to create false impressions that something that has its stamp of approval can be trusted to be "safe & effective" when in fact it is entirely financed and overseen by private corporate interests who use it to foist (p)harmaceutical poisons on the masses & excuse the abuses that are repeatedly visited upon a public that has been brainwashed into believing that these "institutions" are there for "our own good," when in fact, this is patently false. Eliminate them all and see what presents itself as essential after we return to the Constitutional minimums of limited Federal Government the founders envisioned and wrote into the document that supposedly all governmental representatives are loyal to and are supposed to uphold. I guarantee the FDA, a creature of a false system of "deathcare" bought & paid for, foisted on us by Rockefeller interests to displace true "Holistic Health Care" practitioners who were systematically disenfranchised and vilified in favor of the administration of surgery, radiation & synthetic rugs to address symptoms but fail to address root causes and therefore restoration of health and robust functioning to humans it "treats" by those in "practice" is an instrument of death, suffering & cover for those with nefarious agendas to use for their own enrichment & advancement. All of this, especially the widespread distribution of synthetic poisons, is part of mystery religions and occult practices masquerading as civilized "science."
I couldn’t agree more.
Also consider altering genetic makeup ( e.g. Genetically modified organism) makes what ever it is patentable therefore owned. Nature cannot be patented, but genetically modified organisms can be.
Corrected for accuracy:
“Just like the WEF, we are eager to see our children and grandchildren killed by COVID-19 as soon as possible. We have to let the science and data guide us. The FDA is working around the clock to support the process for making COVID-19 the genocidal method of choice."
EXACTLY
+100 likes. That's how I read it too.
The "resistance" at "The People's CDC" is asking for comments in support of access to updated vaccines for all ages two times per year. The post doesn't allow any likes or comments, only sharing, and it had only been shared 11 times before noon today. 😁
Sorry if this was already posted, I haven't read all the comments. Del Bigtree's ICAN recently had a press conference about recordings they have of Peter Marks, mentioned in this article, when he was with the FDA.
https://rumble.com/v6t1673-live-ican-releases-secret-recordings-the-real-peter-marks-timeline.html